Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS has a score of 84.2, which is better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite's global score of 74.1. IPhone XS is an extremely older and just a little heavier phone than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, but Apple was able to build it a bit thinner anyway. IPhone XS has a little bit better screen than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has a quite smaller screen and less brightness, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a little bit better pixel count per inch in the screen.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Apple iPhone XS, because it has more internal storage capacity. Apple iPhone XS has a bit faster processing unit than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has lesser processing cores (although faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
OPPO Find X3 Lite has a much better camera than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a back camera with a way better resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and videos in low-light situations.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a much longer battery performance than iPhone XS, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2659mAh.
The iPhone XS costs a lot more than OPPO Find X3 Lite, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.