Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL has a general score of 82.5, which is better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite's 74.1 general score. Google Pixel 2 XL's body has the same thickness than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, but it's a little bit heavier. OPPO Find X3 Lite has a bit more powerful CPU than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has more RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite features a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bit worse amount of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite larger display. OPPO Find X3 Lite and Google Pixel 2 XL feature quite similar memory capacity to install games and applications, both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a better camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a way higher resolution back-facing camera and a bigger diafragm aperture. The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 22% larger battery size.
Google Pixel 2 XL not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.