Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a general score of 80, which is just a bit better than OPPO Find X3 Lite's 74.1 overall score. Google Pixel 3 is a somewhat lighter device than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, but both of them are equally thin. OPPO Find X3 Lite features a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite features a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has more internal memory. The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a little bit better processing power than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has 4 GB more RAM.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4300mAh battery size. OPPO Find X3 Lite has a better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a bigger aperture to take better low-light photos and a lot better resolution camera in the back.
The Google Pixel 3 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.