Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a score of 80.7, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite's 74.1 score. The Google Pixel 3 XL is a just a bit heavier phone than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, but both have the same thickness. OPPO Find X3 Lite has a bit superior processor than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has more RAM.
OPPO Find X3 Lite features just a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a just a little lower pixel quantity per inch of screen, it also counts with a little bigger screen. The OPPO Find X3 Lite shoots much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light images and videos and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
OPPO Find X3 Lite features a much better memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has more internal memory capacity. The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with greater battery duration than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 25 percent more battery size.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the Google Pixel 3 XL is also by far the cheapest, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.