Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-14 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a is slightly better than OPPO Find X3 Lite, getting a 78.8 score against 74.1. Although Google Pixel 3a is older and a little thicker than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, it's construction is still somewhat lighter. These devices include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so they should give you the same operating system features.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a bit better display than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a quite larger screen. OPPO Find X3 Lite has a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because it has more internal memory.
OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 43 percent larger battery size.
OPPO Find X3 Lite shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a camera in the back with a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution and a larger aperture for better images and videos in low-light environments.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel 3a is also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.