Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-14 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL has a global score of 78.9, which is a bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite's score of 74.1. The Google Pixel 3a XL design is just a little bit lighter than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it is just a little thicker and was released many years before. These phones have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both should count with all the same operating system features.
OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a little bit better screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a little bigger screen, a just a little greater pixels quantity per screen inch and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. OPPO Find X3 Lite has a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has more RAM. OPPO Find X3 Lite has a little better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
OPPO Find X3 Lite features a better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a way more megapixels camera and a bigger camera aperture.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel 3a XL is also a bargain compared to others, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.