Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is much better than OPPO Find X3 Lite's 74.1 score. Google Pixel 4's body is a bit lighter than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it is a little thicker and was released just 18 months before. The Google Pixel 4 features a little better performance than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a quite worse pixels quantity per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit bigger display. The OPPO Find X3 Lite features a much greater storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has 128 GB internal memory.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 54% more battery capacity. OPPO Find X3 Lite takes much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same (4K) video definition and a F1.7 aperture, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a way better resolution camera in the back.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, Google Pixel 4 is also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.