Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is much better than OPPO Find X3 Lite, getting an 82.9 score against 74.1. Despite being the best device we are comparing here, Google Pixel 4 XL's construction is older, somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker than OPPO Find X3 Lite. Google Pixel 4 XL has just a little better hardware performance than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Google Pixel 4 XL features a screen that is just as good as OPPO Find X3 Lite's screen, because although the Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 and a higher pixels density. OPPO Find X3 Lite features a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
OPPO Find X3 Lite has a little better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 16% more battery capacity. The OPPO Find X3 Lite takes much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the same camera aperture and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a lot better resolution back-facing camera.
Google Pixel 4 XL is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the other phone, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.