Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, getting a score of 82.9 against 74.1. Even though the Google Pixel 4a and OPPO Find X3 Lite were only released 8 months apart, Google Pixel 4a's design is somewhat lighter but also a little bit thicker. These phones have the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a slightly better looking display than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a little inferior amount of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400. Google Pixel 4a's memory capacity to install games and applications is just as good as the OPPO Find X3 Lite one, both of them have the same internal storage capacity.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite features a little bit better processing power than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has more RAM. OPPO Find X3 Lite features a superior camera than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a much more megapixels back camera.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a superior battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 37% bigger battery size.
The Google Pixel 4a not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.