Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Clearly white and Just black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has an overall score of 87.5, which is better than OPPO Find X3 Lite's 74.1 overall score. Although Google Pixel 4a 5G and the OPPO Find X3 Lite were released only 5 months apart, the Google Pixel 4a 5G body is just a little lighter but also just a bit thicker. These devices have the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any difference in that aspect.
OPPO Find X3 Lite has a little bit better display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a quite worse pixel count per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little larger display and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. The OPPO Find X3 Lite features a bit more powerful CPU than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features as much memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as OPPO Find X3 Lite, both have the same 128 GB internal storage. The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a much better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite has just a bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3885mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel 4a 5G is also a bit cheaper, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.