Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has a general score of 89, which is way better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite's general score of 74.1. Google Pixel 5 is a lighter cellphone than OPPO Find X3 Lite, but they are equally thin. The Google Pixel 5's processing unit is just as good as OPPO Find X3 Lite's processor, both of them have 8 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
OPPO Find X3 Lite has a little sharper display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a little bit worse count of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. OPPO Find X3 Lite has a much better camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same aperture and the same video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a back facing camera with much more MP.
The Google Pixel 5 features as much memory for applications, games, photos and videos as OPPO Find X3 Lite, both have equal 128 GB internal storage. The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 5, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel 5 is also cheap compared to the other phone, which makes this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.