Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 411 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.16 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 has a global score of 77.7, which is a bit better than OPPO Find X3 Lite's 74.1 general score. Despite of the fact the HTC One M9 is extremely older and somewhat thicker than OPPO Find X3 Lite, it's body is still just a little lighter. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but HTC One M9 has older 5.0 version and OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11 version.
HTC One M9 counts with a little better performance than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and a graphics processor. The HTC One M9 counts with a bit better looking display than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has a really smaller display and a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a quite greater screen density.
OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with much more memory capacity for games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The OPPO Find X3 Lite shoots much clearer photographs and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a much bigger diafragm aperture for better images and videos in low light situations and a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a very superior battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has a 4300mAh battery size.
HTC One M9 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.