Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra has an overall score of 77, which is slightly better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite's general score of 74.1. HTC U Ultra's design has the same thickness than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, but it's a bit lighter. OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a slightly better display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a just a bit lower screen pixels density and a little bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a quite larger display.
OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with just a little better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has more RAM memory and more CPU cores. The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a superior camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a larger aperture and a much better resolution camera.
HTC U Ultra counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a way better battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Although HTC U Ultra is a better device, it costs more than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the OPPO Find X3 Lite. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy HTC U Ultra, else you can save some money and buy the OPPO Find X3 Lite, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.