Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 411 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U11 is a little bit better than OPPO Find X3 Lite, getting a 77.6 score against 74.1. The HTC U11 body has the same thickness than OPPO Find X3 Lite, but it is a little lighter. The OPPO Find X3 Lite features a little bit better display than HTC U11, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger display.
OPPO Find X3 Lite has slightly more memory to install applications and games than HTC U11, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X3 Lite features a little bit better performance than HTC U11, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has 4 GB more RAM.
OPPO Find X3 Lite has a very superior battery life than HTC U11, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery size. The OPPO Find X3 Lite captures much clearer pictures and videos than HTC U11, and although they both have the same video quality, a F1.7 camera aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a back facing camera with a much higher resolution.
HTC U11 not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.