Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-14 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8 ThinQ has a score of 84.3, which is better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite's 74.1 general score. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS, but the LG G8 ThinQ has the newer 9.0 Pie version while OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11. Even though the LG G8 ThinQ is incredibly older and a little thicker than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, it's body is still just a bit lighter.
LG G8 ThinQ counts with a bit better processing power than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The LG G8 ThinQ has a slightly better screen than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and much less brightness, it also counts with a greater pixel quantity in each inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 3120px resolution.
The LG G8 ThinQ features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Lite, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG G8 ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. OPPO Find X3 Lite features a superior camera than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing images and video in low light environments and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a lot more mega pixels camera in the back.
OPPO Find X3 Lite features better battery duration than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, LG G8 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.