Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-14 | 2019-07-02 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2248 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8S ThinQ is better than OPPO Find X3 Lite, getting a global score of 82.5 against 74.1. The LG G8S ThinQ body has the same thickness than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, but it's a little heavier. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS, but the LG G8S ThinQ has newer 9.0 Pie version while OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11 version, so it provides the user some additional features.
The LG G8S ThinQ has a little bit better performance than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a bit more vivid screen than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has a quite bigger display, a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a quite greater pixels density.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite takes much better pictures and videos than LG G8S ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a larger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low-light situations and a lot better resolution back camera.
LG G8S ThinQ features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Lite, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG G8S ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with improved battery duration than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.