Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-14 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ is better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, having an 82.7 score against 74.1. The LG G8X ThinQ is better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, it must be noted that it's also an older, a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier phone. These phones come with Android operating system, but LG G8X ThinQ has the older 10 version while OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit superior CPU than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. OPPO Find X3 Lite has a bit sharper screen than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have a display of the same size, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit higher quantity of pixels in each inch of screen.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite takes much better pictures and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better photos and videos in low light environments and a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a much better memory for apps and games than OPPO Find X3 Lite, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with just a little better battery performance than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has an 8% larger battery size.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, the LG G8X ThinQ is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.