Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-04-14 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is much better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, getting a global score of 82.5 against 74.1. LG V30S ThinQ is an notably older phone than OPPO Find X3 Lite, but LG was able to build it a little thinner and just a little lighter. Both of these devices have Android OS, but the LG V30S ThinQ has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version and OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11 version.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite and the LG V30S ThinQ feature incredibly similar CPUs, and although the LG V30S ThinQ has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. OPPO Find X3 Lite has a bit more vivid screen than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a little bigger screen.
The LG V30S ThinQ has much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Lite, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. OPPO Find X3 Lite captures better photos and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a much more megapixels back facing camera.
OPPO Find X3 Lite features superior battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The LG V30S ThinQ costs a lot more money than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.