Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is slightly better than OPPO Find X3 Lite, getting an 81.3 score against 74.1. Even though the LG V35 ThinQ is a lot older than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, it's body is a little lighter and a bit thinner. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better processing power than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
LG V35 ThinQ has a display that's very similar to the OPPO Find X3 Lite one, because although the LG V35 ThinQ has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and more pixels per inch of display. The LG V35 ThinQ features a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with greater battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 30% larger battery capacity. The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a superior camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a back camera with lot more mega-pixels.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, LG V35 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to others, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.