Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has a score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite's 74.1 score. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but LG V40 ThinQ has the previous 10 version while OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11 version. Despite of the fact that LG V40 ThinQ is noticeably older than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, it's construction is a little lighter and just a little thinner.
LG V40 ThinQ and OPPO Find X3 Lite feature similar displays, and although the LG V40 ThinQ has a higher amount of pixels per display inch and a better 1440 x 3120 resolution, they both have a display with the same size. LG V40 ThinQ has a bit more powerful CPU than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite captures much better videos and photos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing images or video in poorly lited environments and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
LG V40 ThinQ features a much better storage capacity for apps and games than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The OPPO Find X3 Lite features longer battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity.
The LG V40 ThinQ not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.