Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite's 74.1 global score. LG Velvet is a a bit heavier cellphone than OPPO Find X3 Lite, but both of them are equally thin. OPPO Find X3 Lite features a bit more vivid display than LG Velvet, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater pixels density.
LG Velvet features a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than OPPO Find X3 Lite, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG Velvet also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a bit better CPU than LG Velvet, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The LG Velvet counts with a battery lifetime that's just as good as OPPO Find X3 Lite's battery duration. The LG Velvet features a camera that is very similar to OPPO Find X3 Lite's camera, although the LG Velvet has a lower 3840x2160 video resolution, a way lower resolution camera and a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low-light images and video.
LG Velvet not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.