Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing has a general score of 91.2, which is a lot better than OPPO Find X3 Lite's 74.1 overall score. Although it's the best in our current comparison, the LG Wing body is way thicker and notably heavier than the OPPO Find X3 Lite. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but LG Wing has older 10 version while OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a bit sharper screen than LG Wing, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater screen density. OPPO Find X3 Lite and LG Wing feature similar processing units, both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 8 GB RAM.
The LG Wing counts with a little bit better camera than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photos and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a same resolution back facing camera, the LG Wing also counts with faster video frame rates.
The LG Wing has a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X3 Lite has just a little better battery life than LG Wing, because it has an 8 percent more battery capacity.
The LG Wing costs a lot more money than OPPO Find X3 Lite, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.