Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, having a global score of 87.1 against 74.1. These devices come with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more recent 14 version and OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11, giving a couple additional features. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's design is much newer than the OPPO Find X3 Lite's, but it's a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a bit sharper screen than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has a bit worse pixel density, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with way more brightness and a quite larger screen.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has 512 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a bit superior battery life than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes slightly better photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has a lower video definition and a back camera with much less megapixels, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better photos and video in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.