Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| $ 560.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z2 Force Edition has an overall score of 77.4, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite's general score of 74.1. Despite of the fact that the Moto Z2 Force Edition is way older than OPPO Find X3 Lite, it's body is somewhat lighter and incredibly thinner. OPPO Find X3 Lite has a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a bit sharper screen than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a quite inferior pixel quantity per inch of display and a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a larger display. Moto Z2 Force Edition features a superior storage to store more games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity. The OPPO Find X3 Lite takes better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a bigger aperture.
Although Moto Z2 Force Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more money than OPPO Find X3 Lite, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the OPPO Find X3 Lite. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Moto Z2 Force Edition, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the OPPO Find X3 Lite, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.