Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, having a 77.4 score against 74.1. Motorola Moto Z2 Play is an way older cellphone than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, but it is notably thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. The OPPO Find X3 Lite features just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
OPPO Find X3 Lite features a slightly better screen than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a larger screen and a little higher number of pixels per screen inch. OPPO Find X3 Lite shoots a lot better videos and photos than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a much better 64 MP resolution back-facing camera.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a way better battery life than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 4300mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Moto Z2 Play not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.