Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z3 Play is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, getting a global score of 76.3 against 74.1. Moto Z3 Play is an way older phone than OPPO Find X3 Lite, but Motorola managed to build it somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter. OPPO Find X3 Lite has a bit superior processor than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a bit better display than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a quite larger screen, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bit better number of pixels per inch of display. OPPO Find X3 Lite has a much better camera than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a back facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Moto Z3 Play counts with a superior storage for apps and games than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a very superior battery life than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 43 percent larger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Moto Z3 Play is also cheaper than the OPPO Find X3 Lite.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.