Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 560.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Action has a general score of 78.5, which is a little bit better than OPPO Find X3 Lite's 74.1 score. Even though Motorola One Action is a better device than OPPO Find X3 Lite, it must be told that it's also older, a bit heavier and thicker. OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a bit superior CPU than Motorola One Action, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a little sharper screen than Motorola One Action, because although it has a quite worse pixels density and a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bit larger display. OPPO Find X3 Lite takes much clearer videos and photos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a larger camera aperture and a back facing camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution.
The Motorola One Action has a much better memory capacity for applications and games than OPPO Find X3 Lite, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Action also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The OPPO Find X3 Lite has better battery lifetime than Motorola One Action, because it has a 23% bigger battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Motorola One Action is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.