Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Nokia |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Meteor grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a score of 80.3, which is slightly better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite's global score of 74.1. These phones have Android OS, but Nokia 8 V 5G UW has older 10 version while OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11. Even being the best in this comparison, Nokia 8 V 5G UW is an a lot heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone than the OPPO Find X3 Lite.
OPPO Find X3 Lite has a little bit better screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen. The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has more RAM memory.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with just a bit better camera than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs or videos in low-light situations, and they both have a same resolution back facing camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also counts with higher 60 fps video frame rate.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a bit longer battery life than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW is more expensive than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.