Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Nokia |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia 9 PureView has a global score of 76.4, which is a bit better than OPPO Find X3 Lite's general score of 74.1. Nokia 9 PureView has the same weight and thickness than the OPPO Find X3 Lite. Nokia 9 PureView has a bit better processor than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The Nokia 9 PureView and OPPO Find X3 Lite count with really similar displays, because although the Nokia 9 PureView has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels count in each inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880. The OPPO Find X3 Lite captures better videos and photos than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a way more mega pixels camera in the back and a larger aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited environments.
Nokia 9 PureView features as much storage for applications, games, photos and videos as the OPPO Find X3 Lite one, both of them have equal 128 GB internal storage. OPPO Find X3 Lite has better battery life than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 4300mAh battery size.
Although Nokia 9 PureView is a better device, it is more expensive than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as OPPO Find X3 Lite. If you want to save some money, you can buy OPPO Find X3 Lite, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.