Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-14 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Cyber shade |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a score of 75.8, which is slightly better than OPPO Find X3 Lite's global score of 74.1. Nubia Red Magic 3S's body is older, heavier and thicker than OPPO Find X3 Lite. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but nubia Red Magic 3S has 9.0 Pie version and OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11 version, so it gives you some additional features and performance improvements.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little faster processor than OPPO Find X3 Lite, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM memory. The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a bit better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel quantity per screen inch and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S features superior battery performance than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a slightly better camera than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has a camera in the back with way less MP resolution, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also counts with a lot higher video resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 3S costs a bit more than OPPO Find X3 Lite, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.