Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Sonic silver |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 5S has an overall score of 76.2, which is a little bit better than OPPO Find X3 Lite's 74.1 global score. Nubia Red Magic 5S's design is extremely heavier and thicker than the OPPO Find X3 Lite. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the nubia Red Magic 5S has the previous 10 version and OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11 version.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features a bit superior processing unit than OPPO Find X3 Lite. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and a 8 GB RAM memory. OPPO Find X3 Lite features a little bit better screen than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite more brightness, a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite better screen pixel density.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has as much memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the OPPO Find X3 Lite one, they have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity. The nubia Red Magic 5S shoots slightly better videos and photos than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light captures, and they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with a lot higher video definition.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has just a bit longer battery duration than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 5S is a bit more expensive than OPPO Find X3 Lite, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.