Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 560.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is slightly better than OPPO Find X3 Lite, with a 79.9 score against 74.1. Although the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is newer than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, it is somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has 14 version and OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11, so it gives some nice extra features and performance tweaks.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a display that is just as good as the screen in OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit worse pixel number per screen inch, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a brighter screen. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than OPPO Find X3 Lite, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1 TB.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a much better performance than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy A25 5G features superior battery lifetime than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. OPPO Find X3 Lite shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a larger aperture to capture better low-light images and videos and a way higher resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.