Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A30 has a global score of 79.6, which is a little bit better than OPPO Find X3 Lite's 74.1 general score. Although Samsung Galaxy A30 is notably older than OPPO Find X3 Lite, it's construction is a little thinner and a little lighter. OPPO Find X3 Lite features a little bit better screen than Galaxy A30, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a just a bit greater pixel density.
The Galaxy A30 has a greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A30, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a way better camera than Galaxy A30, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels. OPPO Find X3 Lite has just a little better battery performance than Galaxy A30, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.