Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 560.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A31 has a global score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than OPPO Find X3 Lite's score of 74.1. Although Galaxy A31 is a better cellphone than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, we must highlight that it is also older, just a little thicker and just a little heavier. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A31 has 10 version and OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11.
OPPO Find X3 Lite has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A31, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM. The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A31. Both have a display with the same size, the same pixels density and the same exact 1080 x 2400px resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with improved battery life than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has a 16% bigger battery capacity.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has a bigger aperture to take better low light photos, a way better 3840x2160 video definition and a back-facing camera with a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.