Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2021-02-25 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | -- |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 560.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only is much better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, getting an 82 score against 74.1. Both phones we are comparing work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any differences in that aspect. Although the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only and OPPO Find X3 Lite were released only a few months apart, the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only design is a little bit thicker but also way lighter.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM memory. OPPO Find X3 Lite and Galaxy A32 LTE Only have quite similar screens, and although the Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a quite brighter screen, they both have a display of the same size, the same screen density and exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only features longer battery lifetime than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have a back camera with a 64 mega pixels resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a bigger aperture for better low-light captures and video and a much better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.