Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, getting a general score of 83.8 against 74.1. The Galaxy A50 construction is a little lighter and just a little thinner than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, despite of the fact that it was released 2 years before. OPPO Find X3 Lite features just a bit better screen than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a display of the same size, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little greater pixels density.
OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has more RAM memory. The OPPO Find X3 Lite shoots better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a same size aperture, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a camera with a much better 64 MP resolution and a much higher video resolution.
Galaxy A50 counts with a lot bigger storage for apps and games than OPPO Find X3 Lite, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A50 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The OPPO Find X3 Lite features a bit better battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has a 4300mAh battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Galaxy A50 is also by far the cheapest, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.