Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-14 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s has a general score of 86.6, which is much better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite's general score of 74.1. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but Galaxy A50s has the older 10 version while OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11. Even though Galaxy A50s is older than OPPO Find X3 Lite, it's design is a bit lighter and a bit thinner.
OPPO Find X3 Lite has a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM memory. OPPO Find X3 Lite has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a display with the same size, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a quite higher pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a little bit better camera than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing pictures and video in low light situations, a much lower 48 MP resolution camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. The Galaxy A50s counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Find X3 Lite, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy A50s also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has an 8 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.