Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 has a score of 85.5, which is better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite's 74.1 global score. The Galaxy A51 has the same thickness and weight than the OPPO Find X3 Lite. Both phones we compare here work with the same Android 11 operating system, so both should give identical OS features. OPPO Find X3 Lite has a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a bit more pixels per screen inch.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has 4 GB more RAM. The Galaxy A51 counts with a slightly better camera than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it has a tinier camera aperture, a worse (4K) video resolution and a camera with a lot lower resolution.
Galaxy A51 features a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Lite, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy A51 also has an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB. OPPO Find X3 Lite features a little longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A51 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.