Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is way better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite's general score of 74.1. Despite being the best phone in our current comparison, the Galaxy A51 5G is an older, a little bit thicker and a little heavier phone than the OPPO Find X3 Lite. These phones come with the same Android 11 operating system.
OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has more RAM memory. OPPO Find X3 Lite has a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a just a bit better display density.
The Galaxy A51 5G takes just a bit better videos and photos than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a smaller camera aperture and a lot less mega pixels resolution camera. The Galaxy A51 5G has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Lite, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a little longer battery life than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4300mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.