Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 560.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is way better than OPPO Find X3 Lite's global score of 74.1. The Galaxy A52 is a just a bit heavier and a bit thicker cellphone than OPPO Find X3 Lite. The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a just a little greater display density.
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a way bigger storage for apps and games than OPPO Find X3 Lite, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB. OPPO Find X3 Lite features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a bit better battery lifetime than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy A52 features a little bit better camera than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photos, they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back facing camera with a 64 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.