Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much better than OPPO Find X3 Lite, with a 91.3 score against 74.1. Despite being the best cellphone in this review, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a just a little bit heavier and a little thicker cellphone than the OPPO Find X3 Lite. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version while OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11, offering lots of additional features and optimized performance.
OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a little greater pixel amount per display inch. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than OPPO Find X3 Lite, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1 TB.
OPPO Find X3 Lite has a bit faster processor than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy A52 5G captures a bit better pictures and videos than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light photography, they both have the same video quality, a same resolution camera and the same video frame rates.
The Galaxy A52 5G has just a little better battery duration than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has a 5 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.