Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 560.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s is way better than OPPO Find X3 Lite, having a 91.1 score against 74.1. Both devices we compare here include the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison review, Galaxy A52s's construction is just a bit thicker and just a bit heavier than the OPPO Find X3 Lite.
OPPO Find X3 Lite has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a bit better display than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a just a little better pixel quantity per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy A52s features a bit better camera than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it has a smaller aperture, they both have the same video resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same resolution camera in the back. The Galaxy A52s features much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Lite, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy A52s also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a little better battery lifetime than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has a 5% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.