Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A6 is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, getting a general score of 75.8 against 74.1. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy A6 is extremely older than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, it's body is just a little lighter and just a little bit thinner. OPPO Find X3 Lite features a much better screen than Galaxy A6, because it has a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a higher count of pixels per display inch and a little bit larger screen.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A6, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM memory. OPPO Find X3 Lite has a much better camera than Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a way higher video resolution and a lot more MP back-facing camera.
OPPO Find X3 Lite has a slightly bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a superior battery life than Galaxy A6, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy A6 not only is the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.