Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) has a global score of 75.8, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite's global score of 74.1. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017)'s construction has the same thickness than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, but it is a bit heavier. The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a better screen than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a little bit better screen density, a bit bigger screen and a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a greater storage to install applications and games than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
OPPO Find X3 Lite features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a much higher video resolution, a bigger aperture to take better low light photos and videos and a back camera with a lot better resolution. OPPO Find X3 Lite features superior battery performance than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.