Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-14 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A70 is slightly better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, getting a overall score of 76.9 against 74.1. These phones use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A70 has the older 10 version while OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11 version. The Samsung Galaxy A70 is a a little bit heavier device than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, but both are 0.31inches thick.
OPPO Find X3 Lite features a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has more RAM memory. OPPO Find X3 Lite features a little bit better screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a quite greater pixels density.
OPPO Find X3 Lite features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A70. Both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rate and a same size diafragm aperture. The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Lite, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy A70 has just a little better battery performance than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
The Galaxy A70 not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.