Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 has an overall score of 87.5, which is much better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite's general score of 74.1. The Galaxy A71 is an older and just a little heavier device than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, but Samsung was able to make it a little bit thinner anyway. These phones use the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any differences in that aspect.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite features a little more vivid display than Galaxy A71, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen. The OPPO Find X3 Lite features just a little better processing power than Galaxy A71, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy A71 has a slightly better camera than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a back facing camera with a 64 MP and the same (4K) video resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A71 features a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Lite, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A71 has a bit better battery lifetime than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has a 5 percent larger battery size.
The Galaxy A71 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.