Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Prism bricks black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than OPPO Find X3 Lite, having a 92.9 score against 74.1. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has 10 version and OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11. Even being the best in our current comparison, Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is an older, a little thicker and a bit heavier cellphone than OPPO Find X3 Lite.
OPPO Find X3 Lite has a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a little better pixels quantity in each screen inch. Galaxy A71 5G UW has a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Lite, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy A71 5G UW's processor is just as good as OPPO Find X3 Lite's processing unit, both have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM amount. Galaxy A71 5G UW captures just a bit better pictures and videos than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for taking photos or video in low-light situations, they both have a 64 MP resolution back camera, the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates.
Galaxy A71 5G UW has just a bit longer battery duration than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW costs more money than OPPO Find X3 Lite, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.