Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2018-01-06 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G71 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) is slightly better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, getting a score of 79.2 against 74.1. Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018)'s construction has the same weight than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, but it is a little bit thicker. The OPPO Find X3 Lite has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a little less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) counts with a bit bigger storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 256 GB. The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has 4 GB more RAM.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity. The OPPO Find X3 Lite features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.