Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-14 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| $ 560.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is a lot better than OPPO Find X3 Lite, with a general score of 97.6 against 74.1. Both devices we are comparing include Android OS, but Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version while OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11 version. Galaxy Fold is an older and a lot heavier cellphone than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, but Samsung was able to build it somewhat thinner anyway.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a bit better screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better pixel amount in each inch in the display. Galaxy Fold has a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has more internal memory.
Galaxy Fold has a little faster CPU than OPPO Find X3 Lite, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory. OPPO Find X3 Lite features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing photographs or videos in low light environments and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a lot better resolution back facing camera.
Galaxy Fold has a little better battery duration than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has a 4380mAh battery size instead of 4300mAh.
Galaxy Fold is a lot more expensive than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.