Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 411 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 has a score of 87.7, which is better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite's 74.1 overall score. Although it's the best in this comparison, Galaxy M51 is a heavier and thicker cellphone than OPPO Find X3 Lite. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy M51 has the previous 10 version while OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11 version.
OPPO Find X3 Lite has a bit faster processor than Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has more RAM. The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better pixel density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than OPPO Find X3 Lite, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy M51 counts with a much longer battery life than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 4300mAh.
The Galaxy M51 counts with a bit better camera than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light images and video, they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video definition and a 64 mega-pixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.